MD Coast Dispatch

Similar Articles

Salisbury Rejects Referendum

SALISBURY -- The Salisbury City Council put the final nail in a petiti...READ MORE

Ashley Wants Beach Horseback Riding Discussion

OCEAN CITY – A resort councilman brought the concept of horsebac...READ MORE

Mayor’s Prayer Breakfast Features Army Commander

OCEAN CITY – The commander of the infamous Black Hawk Down has b...READ MORE

Worcester Schools’ Economic Impact Gauged At $186M

SNOW HILL -- Every dollar spent on Worcester County Public Schools bri...READ MORE

Problem Property Demolition Avoided

SALISBURY -- A non-compliance hearing on the planned demolition of a k...READ MORE

Mayor Learning While Juggling Multiple Duties

OCEAN CITY – This week The Dispatch caught up with Acting City M...READ MORE

Local Writer Hoping To Land School Free Books

OCEAN CITY – A local mom is hoping to hit the jack pot -- a year...READ MORE

Berlin Christmas Parade Results

BERLIN -- The Berlin Lions Club’s 41st Annual Christmas Parade w...READ MORE

Engagements

Fowler-Witherow BERLIN – Rick and Barbara Witherow of Ocean Pine...READ MORE

CASA Program Provides Stability For Local Children

BERLIN -- Worcester County’s Court Appointed Special Advocates f...READ MORE

County Delays Approval Of Watershed Plan

12/09/2011 | By Staff Writer, Travis Brown

SNOW HILL -- Dissatisfaction with the current language in a state-required Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) caused the Worcester County Commissioners to delay authorization of the proposal Tuesday.

“There are so many unknowns,” said Commissioner Madison Bunting while analyzing the WIP.

After reviewing the plan, Bunting felt that the wording was not “generic enough” and could have a negative impact on Worcester.

“We haven’t even addressed cost,” he said.

Commissioner Virgil Shockley expressed concern about how the WIP would “lump” Worcester in with other areas.

“I see us doing everything we can and still getting slammed,” he said.

Bunting noted that as far as he knew Virginia and Pennsylvania weren’t becoming involved in the WIP process at all.

“Are we eventually going to be responsible for the states that won’t be doing anything?” he asked.

Development Review and Permitting Director Ed Tudor confirmed Bunting’s point about the number of uncertainties with the WIP.

“Who knows when this is all going to line up,” Tudor said. “You just have to take it one day at a time.”

Tudor described the process of dealing with state requests for the WIP as a period of “constant change” and acknowledged that there are reasons for the commission to be cautious. However, not approving the WIP by the Dec. 15 deadline could have its own consequences, warned Tudor.

Commissioner Judy Boggs agreed.

“My only fear is if we don’t submit something [the state] will fill it in for us,” she said.

County Attorney Sonny Bloxom felt the same.

“You know how the state is,” he told the commission. “They’ll do it for you.”

In the event the deadline is not met, Chief Administrative Officer Gerald Mason stressed that Worcester might stand alone in its hesitancy.

“So if we take this tact, we are likely to be out there on our own,” he said, noting that most other counties will or already have submitted WIPs.

Despite the warnings, the commission still felt it would be more prudent to sit on the fence with the WIP until more details are known.

“We should tell [the state] that we’re not going to say anything until we know where we stand,” said Bunting.

The commissioners agreed, with the exception of Boggs, who reiterated her fear that Worcester would be risking repercussions.

“We don’t have a hammer,” she said. “The state has a hammer.”

The commission will send a letter to Annapolis stating that the WIP is a work-in-progress and will not be completed by Dec. 15.

The decision provoked criticism from Assateague Coastal Trust Executive Director and Coastkeeper Kathy Phillips, who said her organization was “extremely disappointed by the County Commissioners failure to take some very simple steps to protect our water quality while contributing to state wide efforts to save the Chesapeake Bay.”

Phillips said the commissioners have “used this opportunity to kick the can down the road, shirk their responsibility, and then complain the state is forcing mandates upon them. The sad thing is Worcester's Chesapeake watershed is such a small piece and the load reductions were so small they could have been addressed easily with available grants and other available resources.”

Phillips said her hope is that the Environmental Protection Agency and Maryland Department of the Environment will “force compliance by Worcester County.”

There are 2 comment(s).


To clarify a very glaring error both PA and VA are developing WIPs as has been required by the EPA. All sectors of the economy from agriculture to sewage treatment plants to stormwater managers are being asked for their plans to reduce pollution. This in not a war on rural MD or any place else-it's a war on pollution for the sake of clean water which sustains us all!
submitted by Jimmy C. on December 12, 2011 at 01:54 am
Why should Maryland counties be forced with this ? Until something happens to the North end of the Bay from other states WIPS means nothing. Some Environmental groups are way out of hand on this issue. Clean up Pennsylvania and some other neighboring states and then lets worry about the watersheD. Until then its a waste of time!
submitted by ThisisABSURD on December 09, 2011 at 11:49 am

Leave a comment

Please complete all required fields.
Name*
Email
Comment*

Submit